• Mechanics
    • —
      • M1. Vectors vs. Vector Quantities; Scalars vs. Scalar Quantities
      • M2. Significance of Newton’s First Law
      • M3. Newton’s Third Law: Its Formulation, Its Significance
      • M4. Momentum Conservation; Its Central Role
      • M5. Space Homogeneity And Momentum Conservation
      • M6. Inertial Mass
      • M7. Gravitational Mass
    • —
      • M8. Angular Momentum Characteristics
      • M9. Vanishing Of Total Internal Torque
      • M10. The Isotropy Of Space And Angular-Momentum Conservation
      • M11. Energy, A Central Concept
      • M12. Work And Its Relation To Kinetic And Potential Energy
      • M13. From Kepler’s Laws To Universal Gravitation
      • M14. Error And Uncertainty Distinguished
  • Thermodynamics
    • —
      • T1. What Is Thermodynamics
      • T2. Heat Vs. Internal Energy
      • T3. Equipartition And Degrees Of Freedom
      • T4. Frozen Degrees Of Freedom
      • T5. Six Versions Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics
    • —
      • T6. Available And Unavailable Energy
      • T7. Entropy On Two Levels
      • T8. Subtleties Of Entropy
      • T9. The Arrow Of Time
  • Electricity & Magnetism
    • —
      • E1. Charge
      • E2. Early Links Between Electricity And Magnetism
      • E3. Monopoles, Not!
      • E4. The Q-ℰ-ℬ Triangle
    • —
      • E5. Inductance
      • E6. The Nature Of Light
      • E7. Why Light Travels At Speed C
      • E8. Notes On The History Of Electromagnetism
  • Relativity
    • —
      • R1. Agreement And Disagreement: Relativistic And Classical
      • R2. Transformations: Galilean And Lorentz
      • R3. “Michelson Airspeed Indicator”
      • R4. c = Constant Means Time Must Be Relative
      • R5. More Relativity And More Invariance
      • R6. E = mc2 As Einstein Derived It
    • —
      • R7. Momentum In Relativity, And Another Approach To E = mc2
      • R8. The Fourth Dimension: Spacetime And Momenergy
      • R9. Versions Of The Twin Paradox
      • R10. The Principle Of Equivalence
      • R11. Geometrodynamics
  • Quantum Physics
    • —
      • Q1. Five Key Ideas Of Quantum Mechanics
      • Q2. Granularity
      • Q3. Probability
      • Q4. Annihilation And Creation
      • Q5. Waves And Particles (The de Broglie Equation)
      • Q6. The Uncertainty Principle
      • Q7. Why Is The Hydrogen Atom As Big As It Is?
      • Q8. Localization Of Waves; Relation To Uncertainty Principle
    • —
      • Q9. Planck’s Quantum Not Yet A Photon
      • Q10. Planck’s Constant As The Particle-Wave Link
      • Q11. The Bohr Atom: Obsolete But Important
      • Q12. Bohr’s Key Atomic Postulates
      • Q13. Bohr’s Triumph: Explaining The Rydberg Constant
      • Q14. H-Atom Wave Functions And Classical Correspondence
      • Q15. The Jovian Task: Building The Atoms
      • Q16. Feynman Diagrams
  • Nuclear Physics
    • —
      • N1. Why Are There No Electrons In The Nucleus?
      • N2. The Line Of Nuclear Stability Bends And Ends
      • N3. The “Miracle” Of Nuclear Stability
      • N4. Pauli Letter Proposing What Came To Be Called The Neutrino
    • —
      • N5. Early History Of Radioactivity And Transmutation
      • N6. Bohr-Wheeler Theory Of Fission
      • N7. Sun’s Proton-Proton Cycle
  • General, Historical, Philosophical
    • —
      • G1. Faith In Simplicity As A Driver Of Science
      • G2. Science: Creation Vs. Discovery
      • G3. Is There A Scientific Method?
      • G4. What Is A Theory?
      • G5. The “Great Theories” Of Physics
      • G6. Natural Units, Dimensionless Physics
      • G7. Three Kinds Of Probability
      • G8. The Forces Of Nature
      • G9. Laws That Permit, Laws That Prohibit
    • —
      • G10. Conservation Laws, Absolute And Partial
      • G11. Math As A Tool And A Toy
      • G12. The “System Of The World”: How The Heavens Drove Mechanics
      • G13. The Astromical World, Then And Now
      • G14. Superposition
      • G15. Physics At The End Of The Nineteenth Century: The Seeds Of Rel & QM
      • G16. The Submicroscopic Frontier: Reductionism
      • G17. Submicroscopic Chaos
      • G18. The Future Path Of Science
  • Supplemental
    • Rainbows: Figuring Their Angles
  • Index
Basic PhysicsBasic Physics
A Resource for Teachers by Ken Ford
  • Mechanics
    • —
      • M1. Vectors vs. Vector Quantities; Scalars vs. Scalar Quantities
      • M2. Significance of Newton’s First Law
      • M3. Newton’s Third Law: Its Formulation, Its Significance
      • M4. Momentum Conservation; Its Central Role
      • M5. Space Homogeneity And Momentum Conservation
      • M6. Inertial Mass
      • M7. Gravitational Mass
    • —
      • M8. Angular Momentum Characteristics
      • M9. Vanishing Of Total Internal Torque
      • M10. The Isotropy Of Space And Angular-Momentum Conservation
      • M11. Energy, A Central Concept
      • M12. Work And Its Relation To Kinetic And Potential Energy
      • M13. From Kepler’s Laws To Universal Gravitation
      • M14. Error And Uncertainty Distinguished
  • Thermodynamics
    • —
      • T1. What Is Thermodynamics
      • T2. Heat Vs. Internal Energy
      • T3. Equipartition And Degrees Of Freedom
      • T4. Frozen Degrees Of Freedom
      • T5. Six Versions Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics
    • —
      • T6. Available And Unavailable Energy
      • T7. Entropy On Two Levels
      • T8. Subtleties Of Entropy
      • T9. The Arrow Of Time
  • Electricity & Magnetism
    • —
      • E1. Charge
      • E2. Early Links Between Electricity And Magnetism
      • E3. Monopoles, Not!
      • E4. The Q-ℰ-ℬ Triangle
    • —
      • E5. Inductance
      • E6. The Nature Of Light
      • E7. Why Light Travels At Speed C
      • E8. Notes On The History Of Electromagnetism
  • Relativity
    • —
      • R1. Agreement And Disagreement: Relativistic And Classical
      • R2. Transformations: Galilean And Lorentz
      • R3. “Michelson Airspeed Indicator”
      • R4. c = Constant Means Time Must Be Relative
      • R5. More Relativity And More Invariance
      • R6. E = mc2 As Einstein Derived It
    • —
      • R7. Momentum In Relativity, And Another Approach To E = mc2
      • R8. The Fourth Dimension: Spacetime And Momenergy
      • R9. Versions Of The Twin Paradox
      • R10. The Principle Of Equivalence
      • R11. Geometrodynamics
  • Quantum Physics
    • —
      • Q1. Five Key Ideas Of Quantum Mechanics
      • Q2. Granularity
      • Q3. Probability
      • Q4. Annihilation And Creation
      • Q5. Waves And Particles (The de Broglie Equation)
      • Q6. The Uncertainty Principle
      • Q7. Why Is The Hydrogen Atom As Big As It Is?
      • Q8. Localization Of Waves; Relation To Uncertainty Principle
    • —
      • Q9. Planck’s Quantum Not Yet A Photon
      • Q10. Planck’s Constant As The Particle-Wave Link
      • Q11. The Bohr Atom: Obsolete But Important
      • Q12. Bohr’s Key Atomic Postulates
      • Q13. Bohr’s Triumph: Explaining The Rydberg Constant
      • Q14. H-Atom Wave Functions And Classical Correspondence
      • Q15. The Jovian Task: Building The Atoms
      • Q16. Feynman Diagrams
  • Nuclear Physics
    • —
      • N1. Why Are There No Electrons In The Nucleus?
      • N2. The Line Of Nuclear Stability Bends And Ends
      • N3. The “Miracle” Of Nuclear Stability
      • N4. Pauli Letter Proposing What Came To Be Called The Neutrino
    • —
      • N5. Early History Of Radioactivity And Transmutation
      • N6. Bohr-Wheeler Theory Of Fission
      • N7. Sun’s Proton-Proton Cycle
  • General, Historical, Philosophical
    • —
      • G1. Faith In Simplicity As A Driver Of Science
      • G2. Science: Creation Vs. Discovery
      • G3. Is There A Scientific Method?
      • G4. What Is A Theory?
      • G5. The “Great Theories” Of Physics
      • G6. Natural Units, Dimensionless Physics
      • G7. Three Kinds Of Probability
      • G8. The Forces Of Nature
      • G9. Laws That Permit, Laws That Prohibit
    • —
      • G10. Conservation Laws, Absolute And Partial
      • G11. Math As A Tool And A Toy
      • G12. The “System Of The World”: How The Heavens Drove Mechanics
      • G13. The Astromical World, Then And Now
      • G14. Superposition
      • G15. Physics At The End Of The Nineteenth Century: The Seeds Of Rel & QM
      • G16. The Submicroscopic Frontier: Reductionism
      • G17. Submicroscopic Chaos
      • G18. The Future Path Of Science
  • Supplemental
    • Rainbows: Figuring Their Angles
  • Index

R10. The Principle Of Equivalence

Based on Basic Physics Feature 122

In 1905, Albert Einstein deduced that energy is related to inertial mass (a relationship embodied in his famous formula E = mc2). In 1907, Max Planck added the supposition that energy is also related to gravitational mass. Perhaps, said Planck, pure energy, even without inertial mass, should experience gravitational force and exert gravitational force. In the same year, as a stepping stone toward general relativity, Einstein formulated similar ideas in a bolder way. Inertial effects and gravitational effects, he said, are not merely closely related, they are identical and indistinguishable.

Imagine passengers in two closed cars with the windows painted over. The first car, after moving forward with constant velocity, abruptly slows. The passengers are “thrown” forward. This is an inertial effect. In front of the second car, which is stationary, is suddenly placed a gigantic boulder of enormous mass (lets say it’s made of kryptonite). The passengers are “yanked” forward. This is a gravitational effect. Einstein hypothesized that the inertial and gravitational effects are indistinguishable, that no experiment performed within either car could reveal whether the passengers were being accelerated forward (relative to their vehicles) by inertia or by gravity. This is the Principle of Equivalence, stated first by Einstein in 1907. Elaborated over the next eight years, it formed a cornerstone of the theory of general relativity. An immediate consequence of this principle is the equality of inertial and gravitational masses, for otherwise the difference in these two kinds of mass would afford a means of distinguishing gravitational and inertial forces.

Let me add two more examples to help clarify the meaning of the Principle of Equivalence. Consider first an elevator falling freely down a very long elevator shaft without friction. To the passengers in the elevator (capable of careful observation) there are no external forces at all. A ball released from the hand will not fall to the floor of the elevator, for it will fall toward the earth just as the elevator itself and the passengers are falling, and to the passengers it will appear to float in air. Relative to the elevator, the ball satisfies Newtons first law, and the passengers, pursuing this and other experiments as they fall, will conclude that they are in an inertial frame of reference. Not at all, say the ground-based observers. The elevator is an accelerated system. It just happens that upward-acting apparent inertial forces cancel out the downward-acting real gravitational forces, and the passengers are deluded into believing themselves to be in an inertial frame with no forces acting. The weightless condition of astronauts in orbit about the Earth arises exactly from this cancellation of inertial and gravitational forces.

Or consider a spaceship, far from any sources of gravitational force, being uniformly accelerated by its rocket engine. This time a ball dropped from the hand will fall with uniform acceleration to the floor of the cabin. From the point of view of an outside observer, the ball remains motionless in space, but the cabin floor is accelerated upward to meet it. The outside observer recognizes that there are no real forces acting, only apparent forces arising from the acceleration of the spaceship. To observers within the spaceship, however, these forces seem quite real. The crew might decide that they are motionless, parked on some planet. According to Einsteins Principle of Equivalence, there is no experiment that the occupants of the falling elevator or the accelerating rocket could carry out that would unambiguously decide in favor of their point of view or the viewpoint of the outside observers. That gravity and acceleration through space produce identical physical effects is the startling assertion of the Principle of Equivalence.

To return to the passengers in the two cars: Those in the first car are thrown forward by an inertial force. Those in the second car are being tugged forward by the gravitational force of a hypothetical huge boulder. We “know” that inertial forces are unreal, that the passengers in the first car only think they are experiencing a force. The inertial “force” they feel is not a force at all, but an effect associated with the behavior of space and time in their frame of reference. If we accept the Principle of Equivalence, we must accept the idea that gravitational forces also are “unreal,” and are in some way merely properties of space and time. This is Einsteins powerful point of view, which led, in due course, to the “dynamics” of spacetime, to black holes, and to gravitational radiation.1


1 There is a sense, too, in which the Principle of Equivalence led to the stunning achievement of the GPS navigational system. That system works only because it incorporates the effects of general relativity as well as special relativity.


⇐ PREVIOUS ESSAY | NEXT ESSAY ⇒

Contact Us

Please type your brief message here.

Send Message

HOME | INDEX | ABOUT THE AUTHOR | CONTACT

© 2025 Kenneth W. Ford

  • Home
  • About the Author
  • Contact